- Approaching Aro
- Table of contents
- Introduction
- Approach
- Buddhism, Dzogchen, and Aro
- Truth and methods
- Principles and functions
- Visionary truth, objective truth
- The futile quest for certainty
- Yanas, contradictions, and understanding
- Essential Buddhism
- Uncontroversial Buddhist lineages
- Buddhism and football
- Yana shock
- Wrathful practice
- Why Dzogchen?
- The scarcity of Dzogchen
- Dzogchen: a controversial yana
- No holiness—vastness!
- No cosmic justice
- Yana slip
- Aro teachings
- Approaching teachers
- Special, ordinary, noble
- We matter to Buddhism
- Terma
- Aro history
- Ngak’chang Rinpoche
- Statements of support
- Books
Recent comments
-
4 days 20 hours ago
-
5 days 1 hour ago
-
1 week 3 days ago
-
1 week 3 days ago
-
2 weeks 2 days ago
-
2 weeks 3 days ago
-
4 weeks 1 day ago
-
8 weeks 2 days ago
-
12 weeks 3 days ago
-
12 weeks 3 days ago

Comments
Once again, dear friends, unto the breach
Thanks again, David, for your pellucidly apt commentary on difficulties encountered in practice. I remember something from "Dangerous Friend" that was a glancing reference to the strangeness of seeing 'personality display' as teaching: the plaintive query, "Why does my lama like 'spaghetti Westerns'?" I also have experienced many instances of having run beyond the limits of known ground with that panicked feeling that I am pedalling furiously in midair. Trying to rationalize, to cram the imponderable into all those convenient categories of habitual nescience-- it can be exceedingly difficult to appreciate being thwarted in this endeavor.
When I read this bit, it dawned on me that it is very probable that every single thing I've ever heard from the Lamas has been a case of 'method, not truth'-- and that if I were less terrified of vast emptiness, I'd have noticed sooner.
Keep up the good work.
Kate Gowen